Develop a strategic plan for fundamental nursing home | Strategic Planning for Healthcare Management

Strategic Plan Assignment:The class discussions and participation in class exercises will provide each person with considerable experience in developing a strategic plan. As the integrative assignment, you will be responsible for developing a strategic plan for an organization  You may develop the plan at the corporate, business unit, or functional level.  As a general rule, corporate and business unit level plans work best.  If you do not presently work for an organization, you may select a health care organization of your choosing or contact the instructor who will offer suggestions.In completing the strategic plan, you should include all steps as outlined in the text and listed in the grading rubric. At a minimum the following components should be included:1. An analysis of the organization’s external environment and an identification of key strategic issues facing the leadership.  You should explain how the issues logically connect to the external environmental analysis.2. A list of the organization’s key stakeholders and the relationship of each to the organization (why does each stakeholder have a stake in the organization?).3. Using the value chain as your guide, list the organization’s primary resources, competencies, and capabilities.  Assess each resource, competency, and capability and identify those that are strategically relevant.4. Assess your organization’s mission, vision, and values according to the components in your textbook.  Make and defend any suggestions you have for improving these directional strategies.5. Based on your assessment of the situation (external, internal, mission, vision, values), what strategic actions would you recommend to your organization?  Be careful to defend your recommendations based on your situation analysis including measurement and implementation strategy for your recommendations.

Your strategic plan should not be any longer than 25 pages including supporting tables, figures, etc.  Therefore, freely use bullets, summaries, etc.  Each plan should begin with a brief (no more than 2 page) Executive Summary that summarizes for key decision makers the recommendations you offer in the document. Please use APA format (this is the preferred format for research/scholarly documents).As a MBA student, you are seeking to advance your career and as such you will be called upon to make presentations to senior management and/or boards. Therefore, in addition to a written plan, you are to submit a video and narrated power point of your strategic plan. The video will be an introduction for your strategic plan. It should be 30 seconds to one minute in length. Present yourself as if you are in front of your Board of Directors. Then after the introduction present a narrated PowerPoint of your strategic plan. Combined the video and PowerPoint should be between 4 to 8 minutes in length.Please review the grading rubric for the strategic plan (which is in the strategic plan module). It is a good roadmap for completing your plan

StrategicPlanningSituationAnalysisStrategyFormulationPlanningtheImplementationExternalAnalysisInternalAnalysisDirectionalStrategiesDirectionalStrategiesAdaptiveStrategiesMarketEntry/ExitStrategiesCompetitiveStrategiesServiceDeliveryStrategiesSupportStrategiesActionPlan

Strategic Plan
 

Strategic Plan 

 Criteria Ratings        Pts           

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Mission, Vision and Values Concise  statement of what business you are and are not in, key components of  mission. Vision statement and Values of organization.
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Mission clearly tied to key strategic factors, 4+ components. Clear vision, values.

 20                    pts                  Partial Credit/Good
Clear & distinctive mission statement with 1-3 components. Limited vision, values.

 10                    pts                  Partial Credit Acceptable
Vague mission statement, does not distinguish organization, no clear components. Limited vision, values.

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unaccetable
No mission statement, vision or values.

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  External Analysis Description of external change drivers: political, economic, demographic, technological, social, legal, etc.
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
7-10 factors, described with related examples, prioritized relevant to the firm

 20                    pts                  Partial Credit/Good
5-6 factors, described with examples, related to organizational events and performance

 10                    pts                  Partial Credit/Acceptable
3-4 external factors identified and described with examples

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Limited discussion of external factors (1-2, poorly described, no examples)

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Internal Analysis Description of functional departments & relationships: finance, marketing, development, operations, HR, etc.
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
6+ described, prioritized, show systemic connections

 20                    pts                  Partial Credit/Good
4-5 described, with examples reflecting key processes

 10                    pts                  Partial Credit
2-3 factors described, with examples

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Limited discussion of internal factors (1 described, no examples

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  SWOT, integration of information Internal Strengths & Weaknesses, external Opportunities & Threats
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Integrated presentation of factors with clear implications for strategy (for ex. TOWS, SPACE, etc.)

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
Cross tabulation or other integrated presentation of I/E factors

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Adequate but separate listing of internal and external factors

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No comparison or integration of internal and external factors

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Strategic alternatives or scenarios Possible future scenarios and/or alternative recommendations for responding to strategic needs
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
More  than one scenario considered, minimum of one well described, clearly  related to organization, clear outgrowth of SWOT, key factors

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
Single alternatives, well described, clearly related to organization

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Single alternative, vaguely described

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No alternatives provided

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Decision criteria Bases for deciding on strategic alternatives
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Clear, well defined, multiple criteria, key factors (for ex. the QSPM matrix)

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
At least two, well defined criteria

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
At least one, poorly defined criteria

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No criteria identified

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Evaluation & measurement Identification & measurement of key indicators of performance and change
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Key areas, clearly measurable, IT linkages, key personnel (MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE BSC)

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
Clearly measurable criteria

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Poorly measurable criteria (e.g., specific, behavioral, objective, measurable)

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No performance evaluation criteria

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Balanced Scorecard (BSC)
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Scorecard includes four perspectives, clearly explained, with links

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
Scorecard presented but not well connected or perspectives present

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Reference scorecard but do not explain or display

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No apparent use of BSC

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Implementation & transition management Strategy for reducing resistance to change & facilitating transition for various stakeholders
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Analysis of stakeholders, culture, and stages of transition, & dealing with resistance, with corresponding recommendations

 20                    pts                  Partial/Good
Listed suggestions and explained rationale for implementation and transition

 10                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Listed suggestions for implementation and transition

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
No consideration of implementation

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Video content/technology Video or  Narrated content is of good quality, engaging, and interesting. Examples  are given and the topic is clearly explained in the script and video.  Demonstrates use of technology in teaching evaluation method. Excellent  quality of teaching topic in an organized fashion.
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Excellent  quality of presentation, engages the learner, interesting. Memorable,  uses technology accurately, clear and concise presentation from the  script. Organized and concise

 16                    pts                  Partial/Good
Good quality, Somewhat interesting, some disorganization. Use technology with minimal skill.

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Poor quality. Difficult to hear the presentation. Discorganized. Quality teaching of material is not evident.

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Video content is relevant Content is  relevant, organized, and accurate. Purpose and Objective, as well as a  summary are needed. Provided in the script/presentation.
 

 32                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Excellent relevent content, organized, accurate information with purpose, objective(s) and a summary in script and video

 16                    pts                  Partial/Acceptable
Minimal  content, organized, purpose, objective(s), summary are provided but are  not reflective of the material that was presented.

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Disorganized  content which was not relevent to the topic or accurate. Purpose,  objectives, and summary are not clear or congruent.

32 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Video length Limited video to 4-8 minutes.
 

 16                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Video 4-8 minutes

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Video less than 4 minutes or greater than 8 minutes.

16 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Strategic plan length Strategic plan is not more than 25 pages (excluding executive summary and references.
 

 16                    pts                  Full Marks/Excellent
Strategic plan is no longer than 25 pages.

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Strategic plan is more than 25 pages.

16 pts
 

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome  Professor’s Evaluation Professor’s assessment of plan/video meeting established objectives and criteria.
 

 16                    pts                  Full Marks/Exceelnt
Plan/video meet all established objectives and criteria.

 0                    pts                  No Marks/Unacceptable
Plan/video did not meet established objectives and criteria.

16 pts
 

Total Points:                            400

Resources: I currently work at Las Brisas of Irving Nursing Homes

https://www.fundltc.com/