Crj 310 assignment 3: leadership personal issues and the rules of law

Points: 200

Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Examine the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Support or critique the requirement that officers possess such an education.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the requirement that officers possess such an education.

Insufficiently examined the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Insufficiently supported or critiqued the requirement that officers possess such an education.

Partially examined the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Partially supported or critiqued the requirement that officers possess such an education.

Satisfactorily examined the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the requirement that officers possess such an education.

Thoroughly examined the higher (postsecondary education) requirements that police hiring agencies have for potential candidates. Thoroughly supported or critiqued the requirement that officers possess such an education.

2. Compare and contrast the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Provide a rationale for why these areas are important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for why these areas are important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.

Insufficiently compared and contrasted the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Insufficiently provided a rationale for why these areas are important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.

Partially compared and contrasted the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Partially provided a rationale for why these areas are  important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for why these areas are important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the fundamental differences between arrest and searches and seizures conducted with and without warrants. Thoroughly provided a rationale for why these areas are important as they relate to the bill of rights and Fourth Amendment guarantees.

3. Compare and contrast the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Provide your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Did not submit or incompletely provided your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

Insufficiently compared and contrasted the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Insufficiently provided your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

Partially compared and contrasted the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Partially provided your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Satisfactorily provided your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the main ways in which Packard’s crime-control model and the due process model differ in the matter of police ethics. Thoroughly provided your opinion on which of the two approaches lends itself to the possibility of ethical violations in law enforcement.

4. Hypothesize two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely hypothesized two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

Insufficiently hypothesized two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

Partially hypothesized two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

Satisfactorily hypothesized two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

Thoroughly hypothesized two (2) situations where police supervisors may be held criminally liable for their officers’ misconduct.

5. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present