b’Please see below and contact’

b”nExercise 14Understanding Simple Linear RegressionStatistical Technique in ReviewIn nursing practice, the ability to predict future events or outcomes is crucial, and researchers calculate and report linear regression results as a basis for making these predictions. Linear regression provides a means to estimate or predict the value of a dependent variable based on the value of one or more independent variables. The regression equation is a mathematical expression of a causal proposition emerging from a theoretical framework. The linkage between the theoretical statement and the equation is made prior to data collection and analysis. Linear regression is a statistical method of estimating the expected value of one variable, y, given the value of another variable, x. The focus of this exercise is simple linear regression, which involves the use of one independent variable, x, to predict one dependent variable, y.The regression line developed from simple linear regression is usually plotted on a graph, with the horizontal axis representing x (the independent or predictor variable) and the vertical axis representing the y (the dependent or predicted variable; see Figure 14-1). The value represented by the letter a is referred to as the y intercept, or the point where the regression line crosses or intercepts the y-axis. At this point on the regression line, x = 0. The value represented by the letter b is referred to as the slope, or the coefficient of x. The slope determines the direction and angle of the regression line within the graph. The slope expresses the extent to which y changes for every one-unit change in x. The score on variable y (dependent variable) is predicted from the subject’s known score on variable x (independent variable). The predicted score or estimate is referred to as xc5xb6 (expressed as y-hat) (Cohen, 1988; Grove, Burns, & Gray, 2013; Zar, 2010).FIGURE 14-1xc2xa0 GRAPH OF A SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION LINE140Simple linear regression is an effort to explain the dynamics within a scatterplot (see Exercise 11) by drawing a straight line through the plotted scores. No single regression line can be used to predict, with complete accuracy, every y value from every x value. However, the purpose of the regression equation is to develop the line to allow the highest degree of prediction possible, the line of best fit. The procedure for developing the line of best fit is the method of least squares. If the data were perfectly correlated, all data points would fall along the straight line or line of best fit. However, not all data points fall on the line of best fit in studies, but the line of best fit provides the best equation for the values of y to be predicted by locating the intersection of points on the line for any given value of x.The algebraic equation for the regression line of best fit is y = bx + a, where_y=dependentvariable(outcome)xc2xa0x=independentvariable(predictor)xc2xa0b=slopeoftheline(beta,orwhattheincreaseinvalueisalongthex-axisforeveryunitofincreaseintheyvalue),alsocalledtheregressioncoefficient.xc2xa0xc2xa0a=yxe2x88x92intercept(thepointwheretheregressionlineintersectsthexc2xa0y-axis),alsocalledtheregressionconstant(Zar,2010).xc2xa0xc2xa0In Figure 14-2, the x-axis represents Gestational Age in weeks and the y-axis represents Birth Weight in grams. As gestational age increases from 20 weeks to 34 weeks, birth weight also increases. In other words, the slope of the line is positive. This line of best fit can be used to predict the birth weight (dependent variable) for an infant based on his or her gestational age in weeks (independent variable). Figure 14-2 is an example of a line of best fit that was not developed from research data. In addition, the x-axis was started at 22 weeks rather than 0, which is the usual start in a regression figure. Using the formula y = bx + a, the birth weight of a baby born at 28 weeks of gestation is calculated below.Formula:y=bx+axc2xa0Inthisexample,a=500,b=20,andx=28weeksxc2xa0y=20(28)+500=560+500=1,060gramsxc2xa0FIGURE 14-2xc2xa0 EXAMPLE LINE OF BEST FIT FOR GESTATIONAL AGE AND BIRTH WEIGHT141The regression line represents y for any given value of x. As you can see, some data points fall above the line, and some fall below the line. If we substitute any x value in the regression equation and solve for y, we will obtain a xc5xb7 that will be somewhat different from the actual values. The distance between the xc5xb7 and the actual value of y is called residual, and this represents the degree of error in the regression line. The regression line or the line of best fit for the data points is the unique line that will minimize error and yield the smallest residual (Zar, 2010). The step-by-step process for calculating simple linear regression in a study is presented in Exercise 29.Research ArticleSourceFlannigan, C., Bourke, T. W., Sproule, A., Stevenson, M., & Terris, M. (2014). Are APLS formulae for estimating weight appropriate for use in children admitted to PICU? Resuscitation, 85(7), 927xe2x80x93931.IntroductionMedications and other therapies often necessitate knowing a patient’s weight. However, a child may be admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without a known weight, and instability and on-going resuscitation may prevent obtaining this needed weight. Clinicians would benefit from a tool that could accurately estimate a patient’s weight when such information is unavailable. Thus Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) conducted a retrospective observational study for the purpose of determining xe2x80x9cif the revised APLS UK [Advanced Paediatric Life Support United Kingdom] formulae for estimating weight are appropriate for use in the paediatric care population in the United Kingdomxe2x80x9d (Flannigan etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 927). The sample included 10,081 children (5,622 males and 4,459 females), who ranged from term-corrected age to 15 years of age, admitted to the PICU during a 5-year period. Because this was a retrospective study, no geographic location, race, and ethnicity data were collected for the sample. A paired samples t-test was used to compare mean sample weights with the APLS UK formula weight. The xe2x80x9cAPLS UK formula xe2x80x98weight = (0.05 xc3x97 age in months) + 4xe2x80x99 significantly overestimates the mean weight of children under 1 year admitted to PICU by between 10% [and] 25.4%xe2x80x9d (Flannigan etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 928). Therefore, the researchers concluded that the APLS UK formulas were not appropriate for estimating the weight of children admitted to the PICU.Relevant Study Resultsxe2x80x9cSimple linear regression was used to produce novel formulae for the prediction of the mean weight specifically for the PICU populationxe2x80x9d (Flannigan etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 927). The three novel formulas are presented in Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The new formulas calculations are more complex than the APLS UK formulas. xe2x80x9cAlthough a good estimate of mean weight can be obtained by our newly derived formula, reliance on mean weight alone will still result in significant error as the weights of children admitted to PICU in each age and sex [gender] group have a large standard deviationxe2x80x89.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89Therefore as soon as possible after admission a weight should be obtained, e.g., using a weight bedxe2x80x9d (Flannigan etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 929).FIGURE 1xc2xa0 Comparison of actual weight with weight calculated using APLS formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (0.5 xc3x97 age in months) + 4xe2x80x9d and novel formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (0.502 xc3x97 age in months) + 3.161xe2x80x9dxc2xa0Flannigan, C., Bourke, T. W., Sproule, A., Stevenson, M., & Terris, M. (2014). Are APLS formulae for estimating weight appropriate for use in children admitted to PICU? Resuscitation, 85(7), p. 928.FIGURE 2xc2xa0 Comparison of actual weight with weight calculated using APLS formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (2 xc3x97 age in years) + 8xe2x80x9d and novel formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (0.176 xc3x97 age in months) + 7.241xe2x80x9dxc2xa0Flannigan, C., Bourke, T. W., Sproule, A., Stevenson, M., & Terris, M. (2014). Are APLS formulae for estimating weight appropriate for use in children admitted to PICU? Resuscitation, 85(7), p. 928.FIGURE 3xc2xa0 Comparison of actual weight with weight calculated using APLS formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (3 xc3x97 age in years) + 7xe2x80x9d and novel formula xe2x80x9cWeight in kg = (0.331 xc3x97 age in months) xe2x88x92 6.868xe2x80x9dxc2xa0Flannigan, C., Bourke, T. W., Sproule, A., Stevenson, M., & Terris, M. (2014). Are APLS formulae for estimating weight appropriate for use in children admitted to PICU? Resuscitation, 85(7), p. 929.144Study Questions1. What are the variables on the x- and y-axes in Figure 1 from the Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) study?2. What is the name of the type of variable represented by x and y in Figure 1? Is x or y the score to be predicted?3. What is the purpose of simple linear regression analysis and the regression equation?4. What is the point where the regression line meets the y-axis called? Is there more than one term for this point and what is the value of x at that point?5. In the formula y = bx + a, is a or b the slope? What does the slope represent in regression analysis?6. Using the values a = 3.161 and b = 0.502 with the novel formula in Figure 1, what is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child at 5 months of age? Show your calculations.1457. What are the variables on the x-axis and the y-axis in Figures 2 and 3? Describe these variables and how they might be entered into the regression novel formulas identified in Figures 2 and 3.8. Using the values a = 7.241 and b = 0.176 with the novel formula in Figure 2, what is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child at 4 years of age? Show your calculations.9. Does Figure 1 have a positive or negative slope? Provide a rationale for your answer. Discuss the meaning of the slope of Figure 1.10. According to the study narrative, why are estimated child weights important in a pediatric intensive care (PICU) setting? What are the implications of these findings for practice?146Answers to Study Questions1. The x variable is age in months, and the y variable is weight in kilograms in Figure 1.2. x is the independent or predictor variable. y is the dependent variable or the variable that is to be predicted by the independent variable, x.3. Simple linear regression is conducted to estimate or predict the values of one dependent variable based on the values of one independent variable. Regression analysis is used to calculate a line of best fit based on the relationship between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y. The formula developed with regression analysis can be used to predict the dependent variable (y) values based on values of the independent variable x.4. The point where the regression line meets the y-axis is called the y intercept and is also represented by a (see Figure 14-1). a is also called the regression constant. At the y intercept, x = 0.5. b is the slope of the line of best fit (see Figure 14-1). The slope of the line indicates the amount of change in y for each one unit of change in x. b is also called the regression coefficient.6. Use the following formula to calculate your answer: y = bx + ay = 0.502 (5) + 3.161 = 2.51 + 3.161 = 5.671 kilogramsNote: Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) expressed the novel formula of weight in kilograms = (0.502 xc3x97 age in months) + 3.161 in the title of Figure 1.7. Age in years is displayed on the x-axis and is used for the APLS UK formulas in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 includes children 1 to 5 years of age, and Figure 3 includes children 6 to 12 years of age. However, the novel formulas developed by simple linear regression are calculated with age in months. Therefore, the age in years must be converted to age in months before calculating the y values with the novel formulas provided for Figures 2 and 3. For example, a child who is 2 years old would be converted to 24 months (2 xc3x97 12 mos./year = 24 mos.). Then the formulas in Figures 2 and 3 could be used to predict y (weight in kilograms) for the different aged children. The y-axis on both Figures 2 and 3 is weight in kilograms (kg).8. First calculate the child’s age in months, which is 4 xc3x97 12 months/year = 48 months.y = bx + a = 0.176 (48) + 7.241 = 8.448 + 7.241 = 15.689 kilogramsNote the x value needs to be in age in months and Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) expressed the novel formula of weight in kilograms = (0.176 xc3x97 age in months) + 7.241.1479. Figure 1 has a positive slope since the line extends from the lower left corner to the upper right corner and shows a positive relationship. This line shows that the increase in x (independent variable) is associated with an increase in y (dependent variable). In the Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) study, the independent variable age in months is used to predict the dependent variable of weight in kilograms. As the age in months increases, the weight in kilograms also increases, which is the positive relationship illustrated in Figure 1.10. According to Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014, p. 927), xe2x80x9cThe gold standard for prescribing therapies to children admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) requires accurate measurement of the patient’s weight.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89. An accurate weight may not be obtainable immediately because of instability and on-going resuscitation. An accurate tool to aid the critical care team estimate the weight of these children would be a valuable clinical tool.xe2x80x9d Accurate patient weights are an important factor in preventing medication errors particularly in pediatric populations. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)’s policy on Prevention of Medication Errors in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting can be obtained from the following website: https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/federal-advocacy/Pages/Federal-Advocacy.aspx#SafeandEffectiveDrugsandDevicesforChildren. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Partnership for Patients provides multiple links to Adverse Drug Event (ADE) information including some resources specific to pediatrics at http://partnershipforpatients.cms.gov/p4p_resources/tsp-adversedrugevents/tooladversedrugeventsade.html.149EXERCISE 14xc2xa0Questions to Be GradedFollow your instructor’s directions to submit your answers to the following questions for grading. Your instructor may ask you to write your answers below and submit them as a hard copy for grading. Alternatively, your instructor may ask you to use the space below for notes and submit your answers online at http://evolve.elsevier.com/Grove/Statistics/ under xe2x80x9cQuestions to Be Graded.xe2x80x9dName: _______________________________________________________ Class: _____________________Date: ___________________________________________________________________________________1. According to the study narrative and Figure 1 in the Flannigan etxc2xa0al. (2014) study, does the APLS UK formula under- or overestimate the weight of children younger than 1 year of age? Provide a rationale for your answer.2. Using the values a = 3.161 and b = 0.502 with the novel formula in Figure 1, what is the predicted weight in kilograms (kg) for a child at 9 months of age? Show your calculations.3. Using the values a = 3.161 and b = 0.502 with the novel formula in Figure 1, what is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child at 2 months of age? Show your calculations.4. In Figure 2, the formula for calculating y (weight in kg) is Weight in kg = (0.176 xc3x97 Age in months) + 7.241. Identify the y intercept and the slope in this formula.1505. Using the values a = 7.241 and b = 0.176 with the novel formula in Figure 2, what is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child 3 years of age? Show your calculations.6. Using the values a = 7.241 and b = 0.176 with the novel formula in Figure 2, what is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child 5 years of age? Show your calculations.7. In Figure 3, some of the actual mean weights represented by blue line with squares are above the dotted straight line for the novel formula, but others are below the straight line. Is this an expected finding? Provide a rationale for your answer.8. In Figure 3, the novel formula is (weight in kilograms = (0.331 xc3x97 Age in months) xe2x88x92 6.868. What is the predicted weight in kilograms for a child 10 years old? Show your calculations.9. Was the sample size of this study adequate for conducting simple linear regression? Provide a rationale for your answer.10. Describe one potential clinical advantage and one potential clinical problem with using the three novel formulas presented in Figures 1, 2, and 3 in a PICU setting.(Grove 139-150)Grove, Susan K., Daisha Cipher. Statistics for Nursing Research: A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice, 2nd Edition. Saunders, 022016. VitalBook file.The citation provided is a guideline. Please check each citation for accuracy before use.Exercise 19Understanding Pearson Chi-SquareStatistical Technique in ReviewThe Pearson Chi-square (xcfx872) is an inferential statistical test calculated to examine differences among groups with variables measured at the nominal level. There are different types of xcfx872 tests and the Pearson chi-square is commonly reported in nursing studies. The Pearson xcfx872 test compares the frequencies that are observed with the frequencies that were expected. The assumptions for the xcfx872 test are as follows:1. The data are nominal-level or frequency data.2. The sample size is adequate.3. The measures are independent of each other or that a subject’s data only fit into one category (Plichta & Kelvin, 2013).The xcfx872 values calculated are compared with the critical values in the xcfx872 table (see Appendix D Critical Values of the xcfx872 Distribution at the back of this text). If the result is greater than or equal to the value in the table, significant differences exist. If the values are statistically significant, the null hypothesis is rejected (Grove, Burns, & Gray, 2013). These results indicate that the differences are probably an actual reflection of reality and not just due to random sampling error or chance.In addition to the xcfx872 value, researchers often report the degrees of freedom (df). This mathematically complex statistical concept is important for calculating and determining levels of significance. The standard formula for df is sample size (N) minus 1, or df = N xe2x88x92 1; however, this formula is adjusted based on the analysis technique performed (Plichta & Kelvin, 2013). The df formula for the xcfx872 test varies based on the number of categories examined in the analysis. The formula for df for the two-way xcfx872 test is df = (R xe2x88x92 1) (C xe2x88x92 1), where R is number of rows and C is the number of columns in a xcfx872 table. For example, in a 2 xc3x97 2 xcfx872 table, df = (2 xe2x88x92 1) (2 xe2x88x92 1) = 1. Therefore, the df is equal to 1. Table 19-1 includes a 2 xc3x97 2 chi-square contingency table based on the findings of An etxc2xa0al. (2014) study. In Table 19-1, the rows represent the two nominal categories of alcohol 192use and alcohol nonuse and the two columns represent the two nominal categories of smokers and nonsmokers. The df = (2 xe2x88x92 1) (2 xe2x88x92 1) = (1) (1) = 1, and the study results were as follows: xcfx872 (1, N = 799) = 63.1; p < 0.0001. It is important to note that the df can also be reported without the sample size, as in xcfx872(1) = 63.1, p < 0.0001.TABLE 19-1CONTINGENCY TABLE BASED ON THE RESULTS OF AN ETxc2xa0AL. (2014) STUDYxc2xa0Nonsmokers n = 742Smokers n = 57*No alcohol use55114Alcohol usexe2x80xa019143*Smokers defined as xe2x80x9csmoking at least 1 cigarette daily during the past month.xe2x80x9dxe2x80xa0Alcohol use xe2x80x9cdefined as at least 1 alcoholic beverage per month during the past year.xe2x80x9dAn, F. R., Xiang, Y. T., Yu., L., Ding, Y. M., Ungvari, G. S., Chan, S. W. C., etxc2xa0al. (2014). Prevalence of nurses' smoking habits in psychiatric and general hospitals in China. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 28(2), 120.If more than two groups are being examined, xcfx872 does not determine where the differences lie; it only determines that a statistically significant difference exists. A post hoc analysis will determine the location of the difference. xcfx872 is one of the weaker statistical tests used, and results are usually only reported if statistically significant values are found. The step-by-step process for calculating the Pearson chi-square test is presented in Exercise 35.Research ArticleSourceDarling-Fisher, C. S., Salerno, J., Dahlem, C. H. Y., & Martyn, K. K. (2014). The Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS): Providers' assessment of its usefulness in their clinical practice settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(3), 217xe2x80x93226.IntroductionDarling-Fisher and colleagues (2014, p. 219) conducted a mixed-methods descriptive study to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventative Services (RAAPS) screening tool xe2x80x9cby surveying healthcare providers from a wide variety of clinical settings and geographic locations.xe2x80x9d The study participants were recruited from the RAAPS website to complete an online survey. The RAAPS risk-screening tool xe2x80x9cwas developed to identify the risk behaviors contributing most to adolescent morbidity, mortality, and social problems, and to provide a more streamlined assessment to help providers address key adolescent risk behaviors in a time-efficient and user-friendly formatxe2x80x9d (Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 218). The RAAPS is an established 21-item questionnaire with evidence of reliability and validity that can be completed by adolescents in 5xe2x80x937 minutes.xe2x80x9cQuantitative and qualitative analyses indicated the RAAPS facilitated identification of risk behaviors and risk discussions and provided efficient and consistent assessments; 86% of providers believed that the RAAPS positively influenced their practicexe2x80x9d (Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 217). The researchers concluded the use of RAAPS by healthcare providers could improve the assessment and identification of adolescents at risk and lead to the delivery of more effective adolescent preventive services.Relevant Study ResultsIn the Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014, p. 220) mixed-methods study, the participants (N = 201) were xe2x80x9cproviders from 26 U.S. states and three foreign countries (Canada, Korea, and Ireland).xe2x80x9d More than half of the participants (n = 111; 55%) reported they were using the RAAPS in their clinical practices. xe2x80x9cWhen asked if they would recommend the RAAPS to other providers, 86 responded, and 98% (n = 84) stated they would recommend RAAPS. The two most common reasons cited for their recommendation were for screening (n = 76, 92%) and identification of risk behaviors (n = 75, 90%). Improved communication (n = 52, 63%) and improved documentation (n = 46, 55%) and increased patient understanding of their risk behaviors (n = 48, 58%) were also cited by respondents as reasons to recommend the RAAPSxe2x80x9d (Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 222).193xe2x80x9cRespondents who were not using the RAAPS (n = 90; 45%), had a variety of reasons for not using it. Most reasons were related to constraints of their health system or practice site; other reasons were satisfaction with their current method of assessmentxe2x80x89.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89.xe2x80x89and that they were interested in the RAAPS for academic or research purposes rather than clinical usexe2x80x9d (Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 220).Chi-square analysis was calculated to determine if any statistically significant differences existed between the characteristics of the RAAPS users and nonusers. Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) did not provide a level of significance or xcexb1 for their study, but the standard for nursing studies is xcexb1 = 0.05. xe2x80x9cStatistically significant differences were noted between RAAPS users and nonusers with respect to provider types, practice setting, percent of adolescent patients, years in practice, and practice region. No statistically significant demographic differences were found between RAAPS users and nonusers with respect to race, agexe2x80x9d (Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al., 2014, p. 221). The xcfx872 results are presented in Table 2.TABLE 2DEMOGRAPHIC COMPARISONS BETWEEN RAPID ASSESSMENT FOR ADOLESCENT PREVENTIVE SERVICE USERS AND NONUSERSCurrent userYes (%)No (%)xcfx872pProvider type (n = 161)xc2xa0xc2xa012.7652, df = 2< .00xc2xa0Health care provider64 (75.3)55 (72.4)xc2xa0Mental health provider13 (15.3)2 (2.6)xc2xa0Other8 (9.4)19 (25.0)Practice setting (n = 152)xc2xa0xc2xa012.7652, df = 1< .00xc2xa0Outpatient health clinic20 (24.1)36 (52.2)xc2xa0School-based health clinic63 (75.9)33 (47.8)% Adolescent patients (n = 154)xc2xa0xc2xa07.3780, df = 1.01xc2xa0xe2x89xa450%26 (30.6)36 (52.2)xc2xa0>50%59 (69.4)33 (47.8)Years in practice (n = 157)xc2xa0xc2xa06.2597, df = 1.01xc2xa0xe2x89xa45 years44 (51.8)23 (31.9)xc2xa0>5 years41 (48.2)49 (68.1)U.S. practice region (n = 151)xc2xa0xc2xa029.68, df = 3< .00xc2xa0Northeastern United States13 (15.3)15 (22.7)xc2xa0Southern United States11 (12.9)22 (33.3)xc2xa0Midwestern United States57 (67.1)16 (24.2)xc2xa0Western United States4 (4.7)13 (19.7)Race (n = 201)xc2xa0xc2xa01.2865, df = 2.53xc2xa0Black/African American11 (9.9)5 (5.6)xc2xa0White/Caucasian66 (59.5)56 (62.2)xc2xa0Other34 (30.6)29 (32.2)Provider age in years (n = 145)xc2xa0xc2xa04.00, df = 2.14xc2xa020xe2x80x9339 years21 (25.6)8 (12.7)xc2xa040xe2x80x9349 years24 (29.3)19 (30.2)xc2xa050+ years37 (45.1)36 (57.1)xcfx872, Chi-square statistic.df, degrees of freedom.Darling-Fisher, C. S., Salerno, J., Dahlem, C. H. Y., & Martyn, K. K. (2014). The Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS): Providers' assessment of its usefulness in their clinical practice settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(3), p. 221.194Study Questions1. What is the sample size for the Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) study? How many study participants (percentage) are RAAPS users and how many are RAAPS nonusers?2. What is the chi-square (xcfx872) value and degrees of freedom (df) for provider type?3. What is the p value for provider type? Is the xcfx872 value for provider type statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.4. Does a statistically significant xcfx872 value provide evidence of causation between the variables? Provide a rationale for your answer.5. What is the xcfx872 value for race? Is the xcfx872 value statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.6. Is there a statistically significant difference between RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers with regard to percentage adolescent patients? In your own opinion is this an expected finding? Document your answer.1957. What is the df for U.S. practice region? Complete the df formula for U.S. practice region to visualize how Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) determined the appropriate df for that region.8. State the null hypothesis for the years in practice variable for RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers.9. Should the null hypothesis for years in practice developed for Question 8 be accepted or rejected? Provide a rationale for your answer.10. How many null hypotheses were accepted by Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) in Table 2? Provide a rationale for your answer.196Answers to Study Questions1. The sample size is N = 201 with n = 111 (55%) RAAPS users and n = 90 (45%) RAAPS nonusers as indicated in the narrative results.2. The xcfx872 = 12.7652 and df = 2 for provider type as presented in Table 2.3. The p = < .00 for the provider type. Yes, the xcfx872 = 12.7652 for provider type is statistically significant as indicated by the p value presented in Table 2. The specific xcfx872 value obtained could be compared against the critical value in a xcfx872 table (see Appendix D Critical Values of the xcfx872 Distribution at the back of this text) to determine the significance for the specific degrees of freedom (df), but readers of research reports usually rely on the p value provided by the researcher(s) to determine significance. Most nurse researchers set the level of significance or alpha (xcexb1) = 0.05. Since the p value is less than alpha, the result is statistically significant. You need to note that p values never equal zero as they appear in this study. The p values would not be zero if carried out more decimal places.4. No, a statistically significant xcfx872 value does not provide evidence of causation. A statistically significant xcfx872 value indicates a significant difference between groups exists but does not provide a causal link (Grove etxc2xa0al., 2013; Plichta & Kelvin, 2013).5. The xcfx872 = 1.2865 for race. Since p = .53 for race, the xcfx872 value is not statistically significant. The level of significance is set at xcexb1 = 0.05 and the p value is larger than alpha, so the result is nonsignificant.6. Yes, there is a statistically significant difference between RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers with regard to percent of adolescent patients. The chi-square value = 7.3780 with a p = .01.You might expect that nurses caring for more adolescents might have higher RAAPS use as indicated in Table 2. However, nurses need to be knowledgeable of assessment and care needs of populations and subpopulations in their practice even if not frequently encountered. Two valuable sources for adolescent care include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Adolescent and School Health at http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/idex.htm and the World Health Organization (WHO) adolescent health at http://www.who.int/topics/adolescent_health/en/.7. The df = 3 for U.S. practice region is provided in Table 2. The df formula, df = (R xe2x88x92 1) (C xe2x88x92 1) is used. There are four xe2x80x9cRxe2x80x9d rows, Northeastern United States, Southern United States, Midwestern United States, and Western United States. There are two xe2x80x9cCxe2x80x9d columns, RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers. df = (4 xe2x88x92 1)(2 xe2x88x92 1) = (3)(1) = 3.8. The null hypothesis: There is no difference between RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers for providers with xe2x89xa45 years of practice and those with >5 years of practice.1979. The null hypothesis for years in practice stated in Questions 8 should be rejected. The xcfx872 = 6.2597 for years in practice is statistically significant, p = .01. A statistically significant xcfx872 indicates a significant difference exists between the users and nonusers of RAAPS for years in practice; therefore, the null hypothesis should be rejected.10. Two null hypotheses were accepted since two xcfx872 values (race and provider age) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), as indicated in Table 2. Nonsignificant results indicate that the null hypotheses are supported or accepted as an accurate reflection of the results of the study.199EXERCISE 19xc2xa0Questions to Be GradedFollow your instructor’s directions to submit your answers to the following questions for grading. Your instructor may ask you to write your answers below and submit them as a hard copy for grading. Alternatively, your instructor may ask you to use the space below for notes and submit your answers online at http://evolve.elsevier.com/Grove/Statistics/ under xe2x80x9cQuestions to Be Graded.xe2x80x9dName: _______________________________________________________ Class: _____________________Date: ___________________________________________________________________________________1. According to the relevant study results section of the Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) study, what categories are reported to be statistically significant?2. What level of measurement is appropriate for calculating the xcfx872 statistic? Give two examples from Table 2 of demographic variables measured at the level appropriate for xcfx872.3. What is the xcfx872 for U.S. practice region? Is the xcfx872 value statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.4. What is the df for provider type? Provide a rationale for why the df for provider type presented in Table 2 is correct.2005. Is there a statistically significant difference for practice setting between the Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS) users and nonusers? Provide a rationale for your answer.6. State the null hypothesis for provider age in years for RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers.7. Should the null hypothesis for provider age in years developed for Question 6 be accepted or rejected? Provide a rationale for your answer.8. Describe at least one clinical advantage and one clinical challenge of using RAAPS as described by Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014).9. How many null hypotheses are rejected in the Darling-Fisher etxc2xa0al. (2014) study for the results presented in Table 2? Provide a rationale for your answer.10. A statistically significant difference is present between RAAPS users and RAAPS nonusers for U.S. practice region, xcfx872 = 29.68. Does the xcfx872 result provide the location of the difference? Provide a rationale for your answer(Grove 191-200)Grove, Susan K., Daisha Cipher. Statistics for Nursing Research: A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice, 2nd Edition. Saunders, 022016. VitalBook file.The citation provided is a guideline. Please check each citation for accuracy before use.Exercise 29Calculating Simple Linear RegressionSimple linear regression is a procedure that provides an estimate of the value of a dependent variable (outcome) based on the value of an independent variable (predictor). Knowing that estimate with some degree of accuracy, we can use regression analysis to predict the value of one variable if we know the value of the other variable (Cohen & Cohen, 1983). The regression equation is a mathematical expression of the influence that a predictor has on a dependent variable, based on some theoretical framework. For example, in Exercise 14, Figure 14-1 illustrates the linear relationship between gestational age and birth weight. As shown in the scatterplot, there is a strong positive relationship between the two variables. Advanced gestational ages predict higher birth weights.A regression equation can be generated with a data set containing subjects’ x and y values. Once this equation is generated, it can be used to predict future subjects’ y values, given only their x values. In simple or bivariate regression, predictions are made in cases with two variables. The score on variable y (dependent variable, or outcome) is predicted from the same subject’s known score on variable x (independent variable, or predictor).Research Designs Appropriate for Simple Linear RegressionResearch designs that may utilize simple linear regression include any associational design (Gliner etxc2xa0al., 2009). The variables involved in the design are attributional, meaning the variables are characteristics of the participant, such as health status, blood pressure, gender, diagnosis, or ethnicity. Regardless of the nature of variables, the dependent variable submitted to simple linear regression must be measured as continuous, at the interval or ratio level.Statistical Formula and AssumptionsUse of simple linear regression involves the following assumptions (Zar, 2010):1. Normal distribution of the dependent (y) variable2. Linear relationship between x and y3. Independent observations4. No (or little) multicollinearity5. Homoscedasticity320Data that are homoscedastic are evenly dispersed both above and below the regression line, which indicates a linear relationship on a scatterplot. Homoscedasticity reflects equal variance of both variables. In other words, for every value of x, the distribution of y values should have equal variability. If the data for the predictor and dependent variable are not homoscedastic, inferences made during significance testing could be invalid (Cohen & Cohen, 1983; Zar, 2010). Visual examples of homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity are presented in Exercise 30.In simple linear regression, the dependent variable is continuous, and the predictor can be any scale of measurement; however, if the predictor is nominal, it must be correctly coded. Once the data are ready, the parameters a and b are computed to obtain a regression equation. To understand the mathematical process, recall the algebraic equation for a straight line_y=bx+axc2xa0wherey=thexc2xa0dependentxc2xa0variable(outcome)xc2xa0x=thexc2xa0independentxc2xa0variable(predictor)xc2xa0b=thexc2xa0slopexc2xa0ofxc2xa0thexc2xa0linexc2xa0a=y-intercept(thexc2xa0pointxc2xa0wherexc2xa0thexc2xa0regressionxc2xa0linexc2xa0intersectsxc2xa0thexc2xa0y-axis)xc2xa0No single regression line can be used to predict with complete accuracy every y value from every x value. In fact, you could draw an infinite number of lines through the scattered paired values (Zar, 2010). However, the purpose of the regression equaxc2xadtion is to develop the line to allow the highest degree of prediction possiblexe2x80x94the line of best fit. The procedure for developing the line of best fit is the method of least squares. The formulas for the beta (xcexb2) and slope (xcexb1) of the regression equation are computed as follows. Note that once the xcexb2 is calculated, that value is inserted into the formula for xcexb1.xcexb2=nxe2x88x91xyxe2x88x92xe2x88x91xxe2x88x91ynxe2x88x91xxc2xa02xc2xa0xe2x88x92(xe2x88x91x)xc2xa02xc2xa0xc2xa0xc2xa0xcexb1=xe2x88x91yxe2x88x92bxe2x88x91xnxc2xa0xc2xa0Hand CalculationsThis example uses data collected from a study of students enrolled in a registered nurse to bachelor of science in nursing (RN to BSN) program (Mancini, Ashwill, & Cipher, 2014). The predictor in this example is number of academic degrees obtained by the student prior to enrollment, and the dependent variable was number of months it took for the student to complete the RN to BSN program. The null hypothesis is xe2x80x9cNumber of degrees does not predict the number of months until completion of an RN to BSN program.xe2x80x9dThe data are presented in Table 29-1. A simulated subset of 20 students was selected for this example so that the computations would be small and manageable. In actuality, studies involving linear regression need to be adequately powered (Aberson, 2010; Cohen, 1988). Observe that the data in Table 29-1 are arranged in columns that correspond to 321the elements of the formula. The summed values in the last row of Table 29-1 are inserted into the appropriate place in the formula for b.TABLE 29-1ENROLLMENT GPA AND MONTHS TO COMPLETION IN AN RN TO BSN PROGRAMStudent IDxyx2xy(Number of Degrees)(Months to Completion)1117117229418301700419195016006111111701500801200911511510112112111141141211011013117117140200015294181621242417114114182104201911711720211422sum xcexa32026730238The computations for the b and xcexb1 are as follows:Step 1: Calculate b.From the values in Table 29-1, we know that n = 20, xcexa3x = 20, xcexa3y = 267, xcexa3x2 = 30, and xcexa3xy = 238. These values are inserted into the formula for b, as follows_b=20(238)xe2x88x92(20)(267)20(30)xe2x88x9220xc2xa02xc2xa0xc2xa0xc2xa0b=xe2x88x922.9xc2xa0Step 2: Calculate xcexb1.From Step 1, we now know that b = xe2x88x922.9, and we plug this value into the formula for xcexb1.xcexb1=267xe2x88x92(xe2x88x922.9)(20)20xc2xa0xc2xa0xcexb1=16.25xc2xa0Step 3: Write the new regression equation_y=xe2x88x922.9x+16.25xc2xa0322Step 4: Calculate R.The multiple R is defined as the correlation between the actual y values and the predicted y values using the new regression equation. The predicted y value using the new equation is represented by the symbol xc5xb7 to differentiate from y, which represents the actual y values in the data set. We can use our new regression equation from Step 3 to compute predicted program completion time in months for each student, using their number of academic degrees prior to enrollment in the RN to BSN Program. For example, Student #1 had earned 1 academic degree prior to enrollment, and the predicted months to completion for Student 1 is calculated as:yxc2xa0xccx82xc2xa0=xe2x88x922.9(1)+16.25xc2xa0yxc2xa0xccx82xc2xa0=13.35xc2xa0Thus, the predicted xc5xb7 is 13.35 months. This procedure would be continued for the rest of the students, and the Pearson correlation between the actual months to completion (y) and the predicted months to completion (xc5xb7) would yield the multiple R value. In this example, the R = 0.638. The higher the R, the more likely that the new regression equation accurately predicts y, because the higher the correlation, the closer the actual y values are to the predicted xc5xb7 values. Figure 29-1 displays the regression line where the x axis represents possible numbers of degrees, and the y axis represents the predicted months to program completion (xc5xb7 values).FIGURE 29-1xc2xa0 REGRESSION LINE REPRESENTED BY NEW REGRESSION EQUATION.Step 5: Determine whether the predictor significantly predicts y.t=Rnxe2x88x9221xe2x88x92Rxc2xa02xc2xa0xc2xa0xc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xc2xa0xe2x88x9axc2xa0xc2xa0To know whether the predictor significantly predicts y, the beta must be tested against zero. In simple regression, this is most easily accomplished by using the R value from Step 4_t=.638200xe2x88x9221xe2x88x92.407xc2xa0xc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xe2x80xbexc2xa0xc2xa0xe2x88x9axc2xa0xc2xa0t=3.52xc2xa0323The t value is then compared to the t probability distribution table (see Appendix A). The df for this t statistic is n xe2x88x92 2. The critical t value at alpha (xcexb1) = 0.05, df = 18 is 2.10 for a two-tailed test. Our obtained t was 3.52, which exceeds the critical value in the table, thereby indicating a significant association between the predictor (x) and outcome (y).Step 6: Calculate R2.After establishing the statistical significance of the R value, it must subsequently be examined for clinical importance. This is accomplished by obtaining the coefficient of determination for regressionxe2x80x94which simply involves squaring the R value. The R2 represents the percentage of variance explained in y by the predictor. Cohen describes R2 values of 0.02 as small, 0.15 as moderate, and 0.26 or higher as large effect sizes (Cohen, 1988). In our example, the R was 0.638, and, therefore, the R2 was 0.407. Multiplying 0.407 xc3x97 100% indicates that 40.7% of the variance in months to program completion can be explained by knowing the student’s number of earned academic degrees at admission (Cohen & Cohen, 1983).The R2 can be very helpful in testing more than one predictor in a regression model. Unlike R, the R2 for one regression model can be compared with another regression model that contains additional predictors (Cohen & Cohen, 1983). The R2 is discussed further in Exercise 30.The standardized beta (xcexb2) is another statistic that represents the magnitude of the association between x and y. xcexb2 has limits just like a Pearson r, meaning that the standardized xcexb2 cannot be lower than xe2x88x921.00 or higher than 1.00. This value can be calculated by hand but is best computed with statistical software. The standardized beta (xcexb2) is calculated by converting the x and y values to z scores and then correlating the x and y value using the Pearson r formula. The standardized beta (xcexb2) is often reported in literature instead of the unstandardized b, because b does not have lower or upper limits and therefore the magnitude of b cannot be judged. xcexb2, on the other hand, is interpreted as a Pearson r and the descriptions of the magnitude of xcexb2 can be applied, as recommended by Cohen (1988). In this example, the standardized beta (xcexb2) is xe2x88x920.638. Thus, the magnitude of the association between x and y in this example is considered a large predictive association (Cohen, 1988).324SPSS ComputationsThis is how our data set looks in SPSS.Step 1: From the xe2x80x9cAnalyzexe2x80x9d menu, choose xe2x80x9cRegressionxe2x80x9d and xe2x80x9cLinear.xe2x80x9dStep 2: Move the predictor, Number of Degrees, to the space labeled xe2x80x9cIndependent(s).xe2x80x9d Move the dependent variable, Number of Months to Completion, to the space labeled xe2x80x9cDependent.xe2x80x9d Click xe2x80x9cOK.xe2x80x9d325Interpretation of SPSS OutputThe following tables are generated from SPSS. The first table contains the multiple R and the R2 values. The multiple R is 0.638, indicating that the correlation between the actual y values and the predicted y values using the new regression equation is 0.638. The R2 is 0.407, indicating that 40.7% of the variance in months to program completion can be explained by knowing the student’s number of earned academic degrees at enrollment.RegressionThe second table contains the ANOVA table. As presented in Exercises 18 and 33, the ANOVA is usually performed to test for differences between group means. However, ANOVA can also be performed for regression, where the null hypothesis is that xe2x80x9cknowing the value of x explains no information about yxe2x80x9d. This table indicates that knowing the value of x explains a significant amount of variance in y. The contents of the ANOVA table are rarely reported in published manuscripts, because the significance of each predictor is presented in the last SPSS table titled xe2x80x9cCoefficientsxe2x80x9d (see below).The third table contains the b and a values, standardized beta (xcexb2), t, and exact p value. The a is listed in the first row, next to the label xe2x80x9cConstant.xe2x80x9d The xcexb2 is listed in the second row, next to the name of the predictor. The remaining information that is important to extract when interpreting regression results can be found in the second row. The standardized beta (xcexb2) is xe2x88x920.638. This value has limits just like a Pearson r, meaning that the standardized xcexb2 cannot be lower than xe2x88x921.00 or higher than 1.00. The t value is xe2x88x923.516, and the exact p value is 0.002.326Final Interpretation in American Psychological Association (APA) FormatThe following interpretation is written as it might appear in a research article, formatted according to APA guidelines (APA, 2010). Simple linear regression was performed with number of earned academic degrees as the predictor and months to program completion as the dependent variable. The student’s number of degrees significantly predicted months to completion among students in an RN to BSN program, xcexb2 = xe2x88x920.638, p = 0.002, and R2 = 40.7%. Higher numbers of earned academic degrees significantly predicted shor “

Duepapers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.